ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Left Behind in Electronic Access: Control Over Personal Health Information While Incarcerated.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients increasingly expect timely, secure access to health information, a right reinforced by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and expanded under the 21st Century Cures Act. Yet millions of individuals receiving care in jails and prisons remain excluded from these advances. Incarcerated populations bear a disproportionate burden of chronic disease, psychiatric illness, and substance use disorders. For many, incarceration presents consistent contact with healthcare, though access to personal medical records during and after detention remains limited. Although the Cures Act prohibits most forms of information blocking, carceral practices prevent patients from viewing records, restrict communication with providers, and maintain electronic health systems that do not integrate with community platforms. Existing digital tools in prisons-such as TRULINCS, JPay, and fee-based tablets-facilitate communication and commerce but rarely support healthcare engagement. Incarcerated patients are excluded from digital health rights afforded the broader population, exacerbating disparities and complicating reentry into communities. Policy reforms should enforce Cures Act provisions within carceral systems, mandate interoperable EHRs that follow patients across settings, and leverage emerging tablet technologies to provide secure patient portals. Aligning correctional health practices with community standards would promote autonomy, facilitate continuity of care, and support rehabilitative and public health goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.