ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Modeling Fatigue and Damage Development in the Annulus Fibrosus Using a Reactive Viscoelastic Framework.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a constitutive model of the annulus fibrosus (AF) that predicts both acute and chronic damage development during repetitive loading.
methodsImplemented a reactive viscoelasticity framework combined with a reactive fatigue constitutive model for the AF, which was calibrated under both damaging and non-damaging cyclic loading, then probabilistically validated using experimental data collected from porcine AF specimens. The annulus was modeled using a three-component mixture to represent the ground matrix, collagen fibers, and elastin fibers.
resultsThe developed material model could replicate experimental data. Correlations were observed between key parameters for collagen and elastin fibers. Calibration results demonstrated low mean absolute error and successfully replicated experimental force variation under both damaging and non-damaging cyclic loading. Probabilistic validation confirmed alignment with experimental data, capturing key behaviors such as relaxation ratios and minimal elastin fiber damage at low strains, while identifying increasing elastin damage under damaging conditions
conclusionThe model's generalizability and probabilistic validation provide a robust foundation for understanding soft tissue damage under cyclic loading, while highlighting the need for further investigations into healing mechanisms and full-disc validation studies. These advancements hold potential for applications in pilot and clinical spine health management and activity-based recovery standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41526565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.