ArticleScientific reports2026
Feasibility study of a newly developed solid gel pad containing tamarind seed gum for diagnostic ultrasonography in human subjects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in Ultrasound Gel Pad Technologies: Enhancing Diagnostic Precision, Procedural Efficiency, and Therapeutic Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasonography-based diagnosis is increasingly used owing to its reliability. However, the conventional ultrasound gel has limitations of patient discomfort and cost. This study evaluated the clinical utility of a newly developed gel pad for ultrasound diagnosis composed of tamarind seed gum (0.1–5.0 wt%), polyhydric alcohol (25.0–70.0 wt%), and water (30.0–70.0 wt%). Ultrasound imaging was performed in four healthy volunteers using our new solid gel and the conventional liquid gel. Linear, convex, and sector probes were used for imaging of the common carotid artery and thyroid gland, liver, and parasternal four-chamber view, respectively. Image quality and volunteers’ satisfaction were assessed using the 5-point Likert scale. For all sites, no significant differences in the image quality parameters were observed between our solid and the conventional liquid gels. The mean satisfaction score was significantly higher for all sites when our solid gel was used. Image quality remained unchanged for all sites after the application of our solid gel. The quality of images acquired using the new gel was comparable to that of those acquired using the conventional gel. This preliminary evidence supports the use of our new solid gel for ultrasonography with all probes for various tissue types and depths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.