Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41526518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Feasibility study of a newly developed solid gel pad containing tamarind seed gum for diagnostic ultrasonography in human subjects.

Takuya Uehara, Hajime Monzen, Megumi Ujifuku, Yukinori Matsuo, Yutaka Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takuya UeharaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hajime MonzenDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, 1-14-1 Mihara-dai, Minami-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 590-0197, Japan. hmon@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Megumi UjifukuWatanabe Kosei Clinic, Shiga, Japan.
Yukinori MatsuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yutaka WatanabeWatanabe Kosei Clinic, Shiga, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K19181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasonography-based diagnosis is increasingly used owing to its reliability. However, the conventional ultrasound gel has limitations of patient discomfort and cost. This study evaluated the clinical utility of a newly developed gel pad for ultrasound diagnosis composed of tamarind seed gum (0.1–5.0 wt%), polyhydric alcohol (25.0–70.0 wt%), and water (30.0–70.0 wt%). Ultrasound imaging was performed in four healthy volunteers using our new solid gel and the conventional liquid gel. Linear, convex, and sector probes were used for imaging of the common carotid artery and thyroid gland, liver, and parasternal four-chamber view, respectively. Image quality and volunteers’ satisfaction were assessed using the 5-point Likert scale. For all sites, no significant differences in the image quality parameters were observed between our solid and the conventional liquid gels. The mean satisfaction score was significantly higher for all sites when our solid gel was used. Image quality remained unchanged for all sites after the application of our solid gel. The quality of images acquired using the new gel was comparable to that of those acquired using the conventional gel. This preliminary evidence supports the use of our new solid gel for ultrasonography with all probes for various tissue types and depths.

Indexed as

Plant GumsSeedsTamarindusAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGelsHumansLiverMaleThyroid GlandUltrasonographyGelsPlant GumsDiagnostic imagingTamarind seed gumUltrasound diagnosisUltrasound gel

Identifiers

PMID41526518
PMCPMC12796232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.