ArticleScientific reports2026
A real-time mobile aquatic plant recognition algorithm based on deep learning for intelligent ecological monitoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of aquatic plants in aquatic ecosystems is drawing growing attention, and accurate species identification is essential for advancing intelligent and precise ecological monitoring. Traditional methods fall short in large-scale, real-time monitoring, and while YOLOv8 is effective, it lacks sufficient lightweight optimization for mobile devices, limiting its practical application. Existing lightweight models also face challenges in balancing accuracy and speed in complex environments, such as dense growth, similar species, and occlusions. This paper introduces APlight-YOLOv8n, an enhanced YOLOv8n-based approach designed to address these challenges using the Faster Detect and Universal Inverted Bottleneck (UIB) modules. Evaluated on an aquatic plant dataset, APlight-YOLOv8n outperforms YOLOv8n: the mean average precision (mAP50) increased to 74.4%, a 1.9% improvement; the number of parameters (Params) was reduced to 2.74 M, a 13.3% decrease; floating-point operations (FLOPs) dropped to 5.5G, a 32.9% reduction; and the inference speed (FPS) remained stable at 32.70. This model enables fast, accurate recognition in complex environments, providing efficient support for real-time field monitoring. In conclusion, APlight-YOLOv8n demonstrates superior performance in balancing accuracy and computational efficiency for aquatic plant detection and offers new insights for mobile ecological monitoring and broader smart environmental applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.