ArticleScientific reports2026
An innovative chitosan-coated aquatic feed pellets production from coastal waste using top-spray fluidized bed drying.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coastal wastes such as crab shells, shrimp shells, and seaweed are rich in proteins, lipids, and bioactive compounds, making them valuable raw materials for aquafeed production. In this work, three aquatic feed pellets were developed and tested under different drying temperatures from 70 to 110 °C to evaluate the pellet durability index (PDI), specific energy consumption in water removal (SEW), and nutrient quality. The formulation containing high crab shell content showed the most balanced nutritional profile but required further improvement in mechanical strength. To address this, chitosan coating was applied using a top-spray fluidized bed system, with process conditions optimized through response surface methodology (RSM). The RSM demonstrated the optimal coating condition at a concentration of about 1.25% (w/v), a spray rate of about 32.5 mL/min, and a temperature of about 110 °C, with the lowest of drying time (DT) and specific energy consumption (SEC). The optimized coating significantly improved PDI and water solubility index while preserving nutritional balance. It also enhanced antimicrobial properties, which are desirable for feed storage. Microscopic and structural analyses confirmed good adhesion of the coating. Overall, this study demonstrates a sustainable pathway to convert coastal waste into high-quality aquafeed, offering both environmental benefits and practical value for aquaculture industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.