ArticleScientific reports2026
Air-fed cold atmospheric plasma device as a safe and effective anti-SARS-CoV-2 air filter.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reactive species generated by a cold atmospheric plasma inactivate AAV through oxidative and nitrosative stress.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) displays antiviral properties, and its efficacy and safety in daily use are subject to full elucidation. In this work, we develop an air-fed CAP device, by inhaling and filtering, to directly inactivate SARS-CoV-2 in the air. The plasma shows a high intensity with reactive nitrogen and oxygen species in optical emission, with plasma electron temperature and density of 0.31 eV and 3.25 × 1017 m-3, respectively, confirming a strong discharge for SARS-CoV-2 disinfection. A qualitative analysis of the device’s discharge process is conducted using a two-dimensional fluid model. The disinfection results show that the typical SARS-CoV-2 morphological spikes disappear after plasma treatment, and the proteosomes of the SARS-CoV-2 virus change. In addition, we conduct experiments on rats to evaluate the safety of the air plasma device in daily use. Rats’ behavior, body weight, food consumption, organ histopathology, and blood biochemical indicators after exposure to this device are evaluated. These results demonstrate that under our experimental conditions, this prototype plasma–air circulation system altered the structural integrity of SARS-CoV-2 and did not produce overt acute toxicity in rats over 4 weeks, although some serum chemistry parameters changed and require further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.