ArticleScientific reports2026
Automatic diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration using machine learning and image processing techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why aren't we using AI in eye clinics? A systematic review of barriers and solutions in AI-based fundus image diagnostics for ocular diseases.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss in older adults. Detecting AMD early can prevent the irreversible damage caused in later stages. Most existing methods detect drusens as a preliminary step for AMD detection, which is quite challenging as the drusens are present alongside other exudates in the retina. This paper presents a system for early diagnosis of dry AMD that does not rely on detecting drusens and integrates handcrafted features with machine learning and image processing techniques. The system performs several image processing tasks, including pre-processing a color fundus photograph of the retina, macula detection, Region-of-Interest (RoI) selection around the macula, and feature extraction from the RoI. Several texture and color features of the macula region are extracted and analyzed using t-test and ReliefF feature selection algorithms. Supervised classification techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) are trained on the selected features with stratified 10-fold cross-validation to classify retinal images as normal or AMD. The system’s performance is evaluated based on accuracy, error, recall, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Classifiers are trained and tested on three feature sets: texture, color, and a combination of both. The proposed system achieves excellent results with texture features and the SVM classifier, attaining accuracies of 98.89% and 95.43% on the STARE and ODIR datasets, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.