ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Total mercury exposure through canned tuna in oil sold in Quito Ecuador.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mercury (Hg) is a toxic element that bioaccumulates in aquatic organisms, posing health risks through seafood consumption. This study quantified total Hg in canned tuna in oil purchased from supermarkets in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador. Three commercial brands were analyzed according to market price (A < B < C) using a direct mercury analyzer. Mean Hg concentrations were 0.22 ± 0.10 mg/kg, 0.63 ± 0.10 mg/kg, and 0.36 ± 0.15 mg/kg for brands A, B, and C, respectively. All values complied with international safety limits; however, the non-carcinogenic risk (HQ > 1) associated with methylmercury exposure from brand C exceeded the reference threshold established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Recommended weekly intake of tuna to avoid health risks was estimated at 106 g (children) and 512 g (adults) for A; 26 g and 126 g for B; and 64 g and 307 g for C, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.