ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026
Data-driven clinical decision support tool for diagnosing mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition that may affect both motor and cognitive function. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a known risk factor for the progression to dementia in the later stages of the disease. Lengthy and time-consuming neuropsychological assessments, by trained experts, often make MCI diagnosis impractical in routine care. In this context, machine learning (ML) may offer promising support for MCI diagnosis. Thus, we analysed longitudinal data from 115 people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) and 226 healthy control participants from the Luxembourg Parkinson's Study, combining ML with clinical data to support MCI diagnosis in PwPD. The data-driven model showed a non-inferior performance to the clinical diagnostic reference test (MDS PD-MCI Level II) and identified a subgroup of MCI individuals that was not captured by the clinical test. This finding suggests that ML models can complement clinical assessments, by facilitating the detection of MCI and complementing the diagnostic characterisation of PwPD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.