ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid model for improved nail disease classification using vision transformers and stable diffusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nail diseases, including various fungal infections, paronychia, and psoriasis, affect millions, and their treatment relies on visual inspection, which may result in inaccurate and delayed treatments. This study explores the use of synthetic nail disease data generated through stable diffusion models to increase the accuracy of the machine learning model. We aim to incorporate enhanced data transformation techniques by utilizing a few-shot learning technique with a small amount of data representation in the text-to-image stable diffusion model. This model renders synthetic data, which provides variety and diversity while preserving the critical components of the original data. The experimental results display the efficacy of the synthetic data that helps provide robustness to the pre-trained CNN MobileNetV2 and Vision Transformer model on a custom real-world nail disease dataset, providing an increased accuracy of 3.26% for MobileNetV2 and 3.02% for Vision Transformers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.