Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41526349›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Time-dependent deployment of medial prefrontal cortical representations in male mice.

Junior Samuel Lopez-Yepez, Anna Barta, Juliane Martin, Maria Moltesen, Tsz-Fung Woo, Oliver Hulme, Ebru Demir, Duda Kvitsiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junior Samuel Lopez-Yepez *Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, Building 1513, 431, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Anna Barta *DANDRITE, Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 6, Building 1182, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Juliane MartinDANDRITE, Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 6, Building 1182, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Maria MoltesenDANDRITE, Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 6, Building 1182, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Tsz-Fung WooDANDRITE, Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 6, Building 1182, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Oliver HulmeDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Ebru DemirDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, IL, USA.
Duda KvitsianiDANDRITE, Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 6, Building 1182, Aarhus C, Denmark. dkvitsiani38@siumed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3175-1774

Funding

Lundbeckfonden (Lundbeck Foundation) DANDRITE-R248-2016-2518School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University (SIU School of Medicine) Start up funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In reward foraging tasks, prefrontal neurons track reward history, yet animals also show persistent choice-history biases. How these histories are represented in prefrontal circuits and guide animals' decisions remains unknown. We asked whether past rewards and choices are incorporated by leaky integration or carried as discrete, history-specific codes, and how these codes are recruited under different task demands. We recorded medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) activity while mice performed probabilistic reward foraging task and fit a reinforcement-learning model whose decision variable, combining reward and choice histories, captured behavior. Neurons represented history-specific rewards and choices while integrating them consistent with their behavioral impact. We then altered reward contingencies and inter-choice intervals and transiently inactivated mPFC. Neural representations adapted to changing task demands, yet the behavioral impact of inactivation was sensitive to inter-choice interval and reward contingencies. We conclude that mPFC hosts redundant computations whose influence is gated by timing and task structure.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorNeuronsPrefrontal CortexAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReinforcement Machine LearningRewardTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID41526349
PMCPMC12887028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.