SynthesisNature communications2026
Fine-mapping a genome-wide meta-analysis of 98,374 migraine cases identifies 181 sets of candidate causal variants.
Synthesis in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multi-omics approaches to deciphering complex pathological mechanisms of migraine: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Dopaminergic Dysregulation in Migraine: From Hypothalamic A11 Dysfunction to a Systemic Biobehavioral Phenotype.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Causal cross-trait mapping at single-cell resolution identifies shared immunogenetic drivers of migraine and Meniere's disease.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Decoding Complex Traits in Goats Through Genome-Wide Association Studies: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Unraveling the Cross-Tissue Neuroimmune-Vascular Genetic Architecture of Migraine Using Integrated Multi-Omics, Single-Cell, and Spatial Transcriptomics: Prioritizing T-Cell Regulatory Networks and Peripheral Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- FINEMAP-miss: fine-mapping genome-wide association studies with missing genotype information.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Cortical network dysfunction in migraine: linking genes, metabolism and clinical disability.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Migraine is a highly prevalent neurovascular disorder for which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over one hundred risk loci, yet the causal variants and genes remain mostly unknown. Here, we meta-analyze three migraine GWAS including 98,374 cases and 869,160 controls and identify 122 independent risk loci of which 35 were new. Fine-mapping of a meta-analysis is challenging because some variants may be missing from some participating studies and accurate linkage disequilibrium (LD) information of the variants is often not available. Here, using the exact in-sample LD, we first investigate which statistics could reliably capture the quality of fine-mapping when only reference LD is available. We observe that the posterior expected number of causal variants best distinguishes between the high- and low-quality results. Next, we perform fine-mapping for 102 autosomal risk regions using FINEMAP. We produce high-quality fine-mapping for 93 regions and define 181 distinct credible sets. Among the high-quality credible sets are 7 variants with very high posterior inclusion probability (PIP > 0.9) and 2 missense variants with PIP > 0.5 (rs6330 in NGF and rs1133400 in INPP5A). For 35 association signals, we manage to narrow down the set of potential risk variants to at most 5 variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.