SynthesisLupus2026
Lupus podocytopathy: A systematic review of clinical evidence from cases and cohorts.
Synthesis in Lupus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionLupus podocytopathy (LP) is an under-recognized pathological manifestation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite being a distinct entity, current American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines do not include specific recommendations about LP, contributing to uncertainty regarding its diagnosis and treatment. This systematic review aims to synthesize the available literature on LP from case reports, case series and retrospective cohort studies to better characterize its clinical course, thereby informing clinical decision-making.Material and methodsA systematic search of EMBASE and MEDLINE was conducted to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included case reports, case series, and cohort studies reporting SLE patients who had biopsy-proven lupus podocytopathy without features of class III, IV, or V lupus nephritis. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, relevant laboratory and pathology results, treatment and outcomes were studied.ResultsThis systematic review included 26 studies (18 case reports/small series and 8 cohorts), analyzing 19 individual cases and 240 cohort patients with LP. Most patients were young females, and LP was often part of the initial lupus manifestation with nephrotic-range proteinuria. Minimal change disease (MCD) was the predominant pathology. Patients with LP had an overall favorable outcome with treatment employing systemic steroid and steroid-sparing agents.ConclusionsLP is an uncommon but distinct manifestation of SLE with overall favorable outcome with treatment using systemic steroid and steroid-sparing agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.