ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2026
Experimental Study of a Newly Developed Prosthesis and Its Initial Clinical Use in Microvascular Decompression Surgery.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a new, refined, and easy-to-use microvascular decompression surgical prosthesis and report its processability, uniformity, stability, and clinical safety.In an experimental study, the processing time required to create five slings and five balls from a prototype clump (0.010 ± 0.001 grams) was measured. Similarly, the processing time to form a clump (0.01 ± 0.001 grams) by plucking an equivalent amount of fibers from commercial polytetrafluoroethylene felt was measured. After approval from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, the new prosthesis was used in 39 consecutive microvascular decompression surgeries.The handling time to make slings and balls from the refined polytetrafluoroethylene material was shorter than that from polytetrafluoroethylene felt (60.5 ± 4.81 versus 155 ± 6.59 seconds, p-value < 0.001 and 84.0 ± 8.51 versus 141.1 ± 7.02 seconds, p-value < 0.001). The tensile study showed that the prototype was significantly stronger than the slings conventionally made from polytetrafluoroethylene felt (6.2 ± 2.12 Newtons versus 1.56 ± 0.647 Newtons, p-value = 0.012). The adhesion study showed an equivalent adhesive strength to the conventional one (0.137 ± 0.05 Newtons versus 0.108 ± 0.05 Newtons, p-value = 0.40). The 39 microvascular decompression surgeries (trigeminal neuralgia, 13 cases; hemifacial spasm, 26 cases) showed no adverse events related to the materials (follow-up period: 9 months-3 years 9 months, mean: 2 years 9 months).The new Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency-approved, refined polytetrafluoroethylene material, which is easier to handle and less time-consuming, exhibited uniform characteristics, excellent manipulability, sufficient strength, and clinical reliability for prostheses. It may serve as a valuable additional option for prostheses in microvascular decompression surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.