ArticleExperimental animals2026
Functional behavioral profiling of multiple Cre-driver rat lines.
Article in Experimental animals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Cre-loxP system has been widely used in neuroscience for spatial and temporal control of gene expression. Although it is considered a powerful genetic tool, increasing evidence suggests that the Cre recombinase itself, without targeting loxP sites, may affect brain function and behavior. In this study, we assessed behavioral phenotypes in several Cre-driver rat lines, each expressing Cre under a different promoter (CAG, Pvalb, TH, Drd2, Tac1, or Thy1) to determine whether Cre expression influences behavioral outcomes. Behavioral testing included open field (for locomotor activity), hot plate (for nociceptive responses), prepulse inhibition (for sensorimotor gating), and contextual and cued fear conditioning (for associative learning). The Drd2-Cre rats exhibited significantly increased locomotor activity and movement speed compared to wild-type controls, suggesting heightened baseline activity. The CAG-Cre rats spent more time in the center area of the open field and showed reduced freezing during fear conditioning, suggesting changes in emotional regulation or learning. In contrast, no significant differences in the nociceptive responses or prepulse inhibition were observed in any of the Cre-driver lines. Following behavioral testing, we conducted structural MRI scans and found no obvious abnormalities in brain morphology across any of the Cre-driver lines, suggesting that the observed behavioral changes may reflect subtle neural alterations. These results suggested that Cre expression can produce promoter-dependent behavioral alterations, particularly in emotion or cognition. Therefore, behavioral validation of Cre-driver lines is recommended in neural circuit studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.