ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Cell therapy in sarcoma: current landscape and future directions.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin, characterized by significant biological and clinical heterogeneity. Many subtypes demonstrate limited sensitivity to standard systemic treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cell therapy has emerged as a promising strategy, with the potential of durable clinical responses seen with genetically-engineered T-cell receptor T-cell therapies (TCR-T) such as those targeting the cancer-testis antigen MAGE-A4 in synovial sarcoma, leading to the US Food and Drug Administration approval of afamitresgene autoleucel in 2024. This constituted only the second approval of a cell therapy in a solid tumor following lifileucel in melanoma and demonstrated the potential of cell therapies in sarcomas. This review provides the current landscape and growing potential of cell therapies in sarcomas, including TCR-T, chimeric antigen receptor-T cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, and mesenchymal stromal cells. However, the broader application of these therapies is hindered by the lack of targetable sarcoma-restricted immunogenic epitopes, spatiotemporal intratumoral heterogeneity, and a profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that impedes effector-cell trafficking, expansion and persistence. While cell therapies hold promise for integration into precision medicine approaches for sarcomas, their successful implementation will require careful evaluation of clinical feasibility, logistical considerations and cost-effectiveness to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.