ArticleThorax2026
Elastic parametric response mapping: quantitative CT scoring for local COPD severity.
Article in Thorax, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent quantitative chest CT techniques improve chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotyping but do not capture spatial variability and potentially reversible disease in local lung parenchyma.
methodsApplying elastic principal graphing to CT scans from Genetic Epidemiology of COPD study participants (age 45-80 years; ≥10 pack-years), we developed elastic parametric response mapping (ePRM), a tiered scoring system (tiers 0-3 and tier Op, ie, lung opacities) that classifies lung subvolumes based on their relative composition of normal lung, emphysema, small airways disease and parenchymal disease. For 3631 participants with longitudinal data, we evaluated how relative tier assignment and mean tier position of subvolumes changed over 5 years and how they associated with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
resultsThe proportion of tier 0 subvolumes decreased with worsening airflow obstruction, while tier 2 and 3 proportions increased. Tier 1 proportions were similar in GOLD 1-2 (25.7%) and GOLD 3-4 (28.1%), with over half of subvolumes remaining in tier 1 or reverting to tier 0 at year 5. In contrast to tiers 0 and 2, baseline mean tier 1 position was strongly predictive of reassignment to more advanced tiers at year 5 in participants without airflow obstruction, GOLD 1-2 and GOLD 3-4 (area under the curves (95% CIs) 0.86 (0.85 to 0.87), 0.90 (0.89 to 0.91) and 0.92 (0.90 to 0.93), respectively). A higher per cent volume of lung retained in tier 1 was associated with less FEV
conclusionCT ePRM categorises local lung tissue into distinct and potentially reversible tiers of disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.