ArticleBMJ open2026
Meaning-making of existential aspects of motherhood transition: a systematic qualitative review protocol using framework synthesis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvidence-based, compassionate practice is a key objective in midwifery care, with particular emphasis on existential aspects of women's experiences during the transition to motherhood. In 2014, a scoping review was published exploring this phenomenon. The interest in this review exemplified the growing scholarly and clinical interest in this subject. However, the scoping review is outdated and does not meet up-to-date methodological standards. This qualitative systematic review will synthesise qualitative studies that explore the existential aspects of becoming a mother, aiming to identify potential unmet needs and articulate women's preferences for care during motherhood transition. Findings from this synthesis may contribute valuable insights for developing evidence-informed clinical guidelines that promote person-centred and holistic maternal care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This qualitative systematic review will use framework synthesis based on Peter la Cour's model of Existential health. The data will be collected from five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science), which will be searched from 2010 to the present day. Study selection will prioritise the transition to motherhood in contemporary Western countries. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for a review, and findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and social media. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251018563.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.