ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2026
Neonatal Postresuscitation Care in Brazil: A National Overview.
Article in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Postresuscitation care (PRC) encompasses structured and systematic interventions aimed at promptly stabilizing at-risk newborns in order to improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to assess PRC practices as reported by pediatricians who serve as instructors in the Brazilian Neonatal Resuscitation Program (BNRP) of the Brazilian Pediatric Society. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive survey among BNRP instructors. Data were collected via a 55-item online questionnaire (Google Forms), covering respondents' professional background, primary work setting, and specific PRC practices. A convenience sample was used, and descriptive statistics summarized the findings. Results: A total of 740 responses were obtained, representing 63% of BNRP instructors. Of these, 79% were neonatologists, 88% with over 10 years of professional experience. Most worked in public (61%) and teaching hospitals (76%). Only 41% had received targeted PRC training; of these, 56% had exclusively theoretical instruction. Regarding the scope of PRC, 37% believed interventions were indicated solely for newborns requiring intubation, chest compression, or medications in the delivery room. Overall, 49% of respondents reported having written PRC protocols at their institutions, though their content and implementation varied considerably. Conclusion: PRC practices in Brazil are neither homogeneous nor systematically implemented across most neonatology services involving BNRP instructors. These findings highlight the pressing need for enhanced dissemination of standardized PRC protocols and comprehensive training for pediatricians engaged in neonatal care. Key Points: · PRC can improve outcomes in high-risk newborns, but its real-world application remains poorly described in middle-income countries.. · This is the largest study to date on PRC practices, based on responses from instructors of the Brazilian Neonatal Resuscitation Program.. · Findings reveal the need for structured training and underscore the importance of further research on the impact of standardized PRC on neonatal outcomes..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.