Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41525485›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Protein synthesis blockade prevents fear memory reactivation via inhibition of engram synapse strengthening.

Ilgang Hong, Yeonjun Kim, Hyunsu Jung, Chang-Ho Kim, Jun-Hyeong Cho, Bong-Kiun Kaang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilgang Hong *Learning and Memory Group, Center for Memory and Glioscience, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34126, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5688-3963
Yeonjun Kim *Learning and Memory Group, Center for Memory and Glioscience, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34126, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5779-760X
Hyunsu JungLearning and Memory Group, Center for Memory and Glioscience, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34126, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0009-2658-0879
Chang-Ho KimLearning and Memory Group, Center for Memory and Glioscience, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34126, South Korea.
Jun-Hyeong ChoDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-3583
Bong-Kiun KaangLearning and Memory Group, Center for Memory and Glioscience, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34126, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7593-9707

Funding

Institute for Basic Science (IBS) IBS-R001-D3National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2012R1A3A1050385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory relies on ensembles of engram cells in the brain. While previous studies have established the existence of these cells, the relationship between cellular and synaptic activity remains unclear. To address this, we applied the dual-enhanced green fluorescent protein reconstitution across synaptic partners (dual-eGRASP) technique in mice to examine synaptic connectivity between the ventral CA1 and the basal amygdala during memory formation. We found that contextual fear conditioning increased engram-to-engram synapse (engram synapse) density and induced structural potentiation, highlighting their importance in associative memory. Additionally, we investigated the role of protein synthesis in memory formation by drug-induced amnesia using anisomycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor. Mice injected with anisomycin once (1xANI) showed impaired natural recall but still displayed fear responses upon optogenetic reactivation. In contrast, mice that received four anisomycin injections over 6 h (4xANI) showed significantly impaired natural recall and failed to exhibit fear responses upon optogenetic reactivation. This behavioral phenotype correlated with synaptic changes as assessed using dual eGRASP, where 1xANI mice exhibited no significant reduction in engram synapse density but had significantly smaller spine sizes, whereas 4xANI mice showed both a significant reduction in engram synapse density and spine size. Our results indicate that protein synthesis inhibition significantly reduces engram synapse density and spine size, changes that correlate with reductions in fear memory during both natural and artificial recall.

Indexed as

FearMemoryProtein BiosynthesisSynapsesAnimalsAnisomycinCA1 Region, HippocampalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOptogeneticsProtein Synthesis InhibitorsAnisomycinProtein Synthesis Inhibitorsamnesiaanisomycindual-eGRASPengram synapseprotein synthesis

Identifiers

PMID41525485
PMCPMC12818406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.