ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Molecular detection of Orientia tsutsugamushi infection in bats from the China-Myanmar border.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orientia tsutsugamushi (Ot), the causative agent of tsutsugamushi disease (TD), has been detected in Muridae, Soricidae, Cricetidae, Canidae, Artiodactyla, and birds, as well as in its trombiculid mite vectors. However, to date, scarce reports have documented Ot infection in bats. TD is an ancient zoonotic disease transmitted through the bite of infected trombiculid mites. The global disease burden of TD, particularly in impoverished regions, warrants renewed attention and a reevaluation of public health strategies. In this study, we analyzed bat samples for Ot using nested PCR (nPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for both qualitative and quantitative detection. Genetic evolution and divergence time of the detected Ot sequences were assessed using bioinformatics tools, including BioAider, Clustal X2, MEGA-X, and BEAST. Ot was detected in 7.32% (44/601) of bat samples by qPCR. At least three genotypes, including Karp, Gilliam, and Kato, were identified in both insectivorous bats (Hipposideros larvatus and Hipposideros armiger) and frugivorous bats (Rousettus amplexicaudatus and Cynopterus sphinx). Ot DNA was detected in multiple tissues, including heart, kidney, spleen, lung, rectum, liver, and brain, with median copy numbers ranging from 28.60 to 1069.76 copies/μL. Notably, divergence analysis suggests that Ot isolated from bats emerged around 126 AD, later than its appearance in rodents, humans, and chiggers (approximately 4140 BC), indicating that Ot infection in bats may originate from other animals or vectors. Our findings recommend ongoing monitoring of Ot in bats and their ectoparasites, which will provide a basis for risk assessment and guide strategies for the prevention and control of scrub typhus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.