ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Overcoming the widespread flaws in the annotation of vertebrate selenoprotein genes in public databases.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracing the vertebrate selenoproteome evolution reveals expansions in ray-finned fishes and convergent depletions in tetrapods.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Ten quick tips for using the NIH Comparative Genomics Resource.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome annotations provide the essential framework for genomic analyses, capturing our current knowledge of gene structure and function as inferred from computational predictions and experimental evidence. Even as automated annotation pipelines become more sophisticated, their accuracy in representing unconventional gene expression events remains largely untested. Here, we address this gap by examining the most common form of translational recoding: the insertion of selenocysteine (Sec), a non-canonical amino acid incorporated into selenoproteins, oxidoreductase enzymes carrying essential roles in redox homeostasis. Sec insertion occurs in response to UGA, normally interpreted as stop codon, but recoded in selenoprotein mRNAs. Owing to the dual function of UGA, the identification of selenoprotein genes poses a challenge. We show that the vertebrate selenoprotein genes are widely misannotated in major public databases. Only 11% and 5% of selenoprotein genes are well annotated in Ensembl and NCBI GenBank, respectively, due to the lack of dedicated selenoprotein annotation pipelines. In most cases (81% and 84%), overlapping flawed annotations are present which lack the Sec-encoding UGA. In contrast, NCBI RefSeq employs a dedicated selenoprotein pipeline, yet with some shortcomings: its selenoprotein annotations are correct in 77% of cases, and most errors affect families with a C-terminal Sec residue. We argue that selenoproteins must be correctly annotated in public databases and that must occur via automated pipelines, to keep the pace with genome sequencing. To facilitate this task, we present a new version of Selenoprofiles, an homology based tool for selenoprotein prediction that produces predictions with accuracy comparable to manual curation, and can be easily deployed and integrated in existing annotation pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.