Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41525367›Full record

ReviewEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2026

Seven challenges in affective inertia research.

Sijing Shao, Anthony D Ong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sijing ShaoDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University.
Anthony D OngDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University.ORCID 0000-0002-5032-667X

Funding

Advancing the Study of Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Cognitive Functioning in Older Adults Through the Use of Integrative Data AnalysisR01AG082954 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Eileen Kranz Graham · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
National Institutes of Health; National Institute on AgingNIA NIH HHS R01 AG082954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective inertia-the persistence of emotional states over time-has garnered growing attention in affective science due to its implications for psychological well-being and emotion regulation. Yet empirical progress has been hindered by conceptual ambiguities, measurement challenges, and statistical limitations. Here, we identify seven interrelated challenges spanning three domains:

Indexed as

AffectEmotional RegulationEmotionsHumansModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID41525367
PMCPMC12798691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.