ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Meningitis diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in rural, northern Uganda: 2015-2024.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meningitis affects over 2.5 million people worldwide, primarily within resource-limited regions of the meningitis belt of Africa. In 2017, we implemented a cryptococcal meningitis (CM) diagnosis and treatment program (CM-DTP) designed to improve CM outcomes. In 2021, a meningitis diagnosis and treatment program (MEN-DTP) began to include all etiologies of meningitis to assess the impact of expanded diagnosis and treatment of meningitis. We conducted a retrospective study utilizing clinical records from 1443 adult patients admitted to Lira Regional Referral Hospital (LRRH) over three time periods between 2015-2024. Group 1 included 321 patients in a historical control group; Group 2 consisted of 890 patients during the CM-DTP and Group 3 included 232 patients during the MEN-DTP. Group 1 received routine meningitis care, Group 2 received testing and treatment focused on CM, and Group 3 received expanded diagnostic testing, including gram stain, culture, PCR- and antigen-based testing. Meningitis diagnosis and in-hospital mortality outcomes were assessed to evaluate our programs. A confirmed meningitis etiology was found in 13.7% in Group 1, 20.7% in Group 2, and 42.2% in Group 3. In Group 3, confirmed etiologies were identified based on culture (n = 30), Pastorex LA (n = 23), BioFire PCR (n = 56), GeneXpert Ultra (n = 14), and serum or CSF CrAg LFA (n = 53). Overall, more confirmed etiologies of meningitis were identified among people living with HIV (PLWH) (n = 319) compared to those without HIV (n = 22) in Group 3. Antibiotic use increased with pre-admission antibiotic use doubling from Group 1 to Group 3 (10.6% to 27.2%). Compared to Group 1, mortality improved in Groups 2 and 3. Overall, PLWH had increased mortality compared to those without HIV (32.4% vs. 13.3%). Introduction of molecular diagnostics increased meningitis diagnoses and improved outcomes, particularly in those with CM. MEN-DTP increased confirmed diagnoses, yet half remained undiagnosed, supporting investigation of deep sequencing technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.