Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41525273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The Demodifier: A tool for screening modification-induced alternate peptide taxonomy in palaeoproteomics.

Miranda Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Miranda EvansDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-9268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In palaeoproteomic research, the accuracy of taxonomic matches is crucial, as research questions frequently hinge on which species were utilised by ancient people. However, protein modifications including deamidation of glutamine and asparagine, and conversion of glutamine or glutamic acid to pyroglutamic acid, can change the sequence of peptides, leading to spurious taxonomic detections and potentially inaccurate archaeological interpretations. While a handful of examples of this phenomenon have been reported in the literature, the issue is potentially much wider reaching than currently realised. In reality, any time a peptide containing a deamidated glutamine or asparagine residue, an unmodified glutamic acid or aspartic acid residue, or a pyroglutamic acid modification is detected by proteomic search software, the sequence, and therefore potentially its taxonomy, may be incorrect, which could potentially lead to unsound archaeological interpretations. The Demodifier is a fast, open source tool which solves this issue by screening for modification-induced alternate peptide taxonomy, enabling archaeologists to make informed interpretations of the taxonomies of peptides detected in ancient samples. To assess its utility, The Demodifier is tested against an archaeological dataset containing all unique peptides reported in palaeoproteomic studies of dental calculus and vessels. The results reveal that modification-induced alternate peptide taxonomies are severely under-reported, occurring almost ten times more frequently than previously understood. Modifications were found to produce three different types of inaccurate taxonomic matches: those which yielded completely different taxonomic lowest common ancestors to the input peptide, those which were more taxonomically specific than the input peptide, and those which were less taxonomically specific than the input peptide. The Demodifier therefore enables the rapid detection of potentially inaccurate peptide taxonomies, avoiding spurious archaeological interpretations in future studies.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyPaleontologyPeptidesProteomicsSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsFossilsHumansPeptides

Identifiers

PMID41525273
PMCPMC12795368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.