ArticlePloS one2026
Prioritizing areas for post-fire restoration in Greece using mixed-methods spatial analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Mediterranean region will likely face an increase in the frequency and intensity of wildfires due to climate change. Despite being fire-prone, Greece lacks a developed standardized system for identifying and prioritizing burned areas in relation to their restoration needs. Prioritization of areas for post-fire restoration efforts using Geographic Information System and Remote Sensing is a powerful decision-making tool, which, however, can be insufficient in effectively integrating socio-ecological criteria and perspectives from multiple stakeholders. Combining qualitative methods such as interviews with remotely sensed data can enhance the understanding of nuances in a local context. We designed an approach to identify high-priority areas for post-fire vegetation restoration. The identification was based on stakeholder interviews and the subsequent integration of their responses with subsequent multi-criteria overlay analysis. We selected criteria to rank the areas by interviewing 15 stakeholders working on post-fire issues. The expert interviews revealed the key characteristics respondents consider essential for prioritizing burned areas for restoration. Areas covering 77.25 km² were selected for restoration depending on the fire history, slope, and designation as part of the protected areas. Outcomes of the analysis helped to highlight three locations that potentially need special attention, with the total area of 31 km². We propose a prioritization system that is flexible, scalable, and can help government agencies, local foresters, private consultancies, and NGOs plan restoration actions and optimize the effectiveness of restoration programs in various ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.