Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41525245›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026

Atypical Appendicitis Mimicking Gynecological Pathology: A Diagnostic Challenge in a Middle-Aged Woman.

Uma Hemant Chourasia

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Uma Hemant ChourasiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2438-143X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, but the diagnosis may remain unclear and challenging, particularly in middle-aged women who present with atypical features. Atypical appendicitis, defined as appendiceal inflammation without classic migratory pain, nausea, or fever; it often mimics gynecological disorders, contributing to diagnostic delays. The present case is unique because it involved an unusually prolonged 2-month history of persistent suprapubic pain before acute exacerbation. Such a chronic course preceding the acute phase is uncommon and further complicated the diagnostic process, underscoring the need for clinical vigilance in prolonged, unexplained lower abdominal pain. CASE REPORT A 46-year-old woman presented with a 2-month history of persistent suprapubic pain without associated systemic symptoms. Her gynecological history included prolonged intrauterine copper device use and recent postcoital bleeding. Initial clinical evaluation suggested pelvic inflammatory disease, and empirical antibiotics provided minimal symptomatic relief. Laboratory investigations and imaging, including pelvic ultrasound and computed tomography, were inconclusive, demonstrating bilateral simple ovarian cysts and a minimally distended appendix with mild periappendiceal fat stranding. Due to worsening localized right lower abdominal pain and persistent symptoms, laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Histopathology confirmed early acute appendicitis. The patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS This case underscores the need to maintain high clinical suspicion for appendicitis despite normal white blood cell counts and equivocal imaging, thereby supporting re-evaluation protocols for persistent abdominal pain.

Indexed as

AppendicitisOvarian CystsAbdominal PainAppendectomyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41525245
PMCPMC12817603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.