ArticleJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
Crowdsourcing is Acceptable to Develop Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Promotions in Alabama: A Qualitative Study with Sexual Minority Men and Sexual Health Providers.
Article in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
IntroductionCrowdsourcing engages the community to create and share solutions; this participatory method could be used to create effective pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) promotions. We explored acceptability of using crowdsourcing to develop PrEP promotions among sexual minority men (SMM) and sexual health providers in Alabama.MethodsWe conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with SMM and interviews with sexual health providers with guides grounded in the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. We employed thematic analysis through deductive and inductive coding.ResultsTen SMM (60% Black, 50% younger than 30 years) participated in FGDs, and six providers completed interviews. We found four themes: 1) Personal identity and background inform the participation and products of crowdsourcing, 2) SMM and providers are motivated to participate in crowdsourcing, 3) Crowdsourcing participants require resources to effectively engage, and 4) Logistic and social factors are barriers to crowdsourcing participation.DiscussionCrowdsourcing as a strategy to create PrEP promotions in the Southern United states would be acceptable and feasible in the correct context. These formative, yet novel, findings demonstrate that SMM and sexual health providers would be willing to participate in crowdsourcing events and also provide key insight to design crowdsourcing events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.