ArticleAdvances in therapy2026
A REtrospective Study to Describe the Real-World Treatment Landscape in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant PROstate Cancer: REMPRO.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04801186 (REMPRO Registry A Multi-country, Multi-centre, Non-interventional, Retrospective Study to Describe the Real-world Treatment Patterns and Associated Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostates Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
REMPRO Registry A Multi-country, Multi-centre, Non-interventional, Retrospective Study to Describe the Real-world Treatment Patterns and Associated Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostates Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) presents significant treatment challenges. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer for over 80 years, its efficacy is often limited to the initial treatment phase for most patients. Recent clinical trials have investigated various therapeutic options for mCRPC; however, real-world evidence is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the current treatment landscape and to identify unmet clinical needs.
methodsA multi-country, retrospective, non-interventional study was conducted across 31 centres in Latin America, the Middle East and Asia. Adults diagnosed with mCRPC between January 2016 and December 2018 were enrolled as the study subjects. Treatment patterns were thoroughly analysed, including those used when patients were at the metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) settings.
resultsAmong 795 enrolled patients with mCRPC (most aged ≥ 65 years), significant attrition was observed between treatment lines: approximately 50% of patients on first-line (1L) therapy advanced to second line (2L) but only 23.5% proceeded to third line (3L). New hormonal agent (NHA)-based therapies were the most prevalent choice for 1L and 2L, with post-chemotherapy NHA being the most common 1L-2L sequence. Disease progression, the primary reason for discontinuation across all regimens, occurred in > 60% of patients during mCRPC treatment. Generally, median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) decreased with each subsequent line of therapy. This study also highlights the inadequacy of prostate cancer screening in these regions.
conclusionThis study offers valuable insights into the current treatment landscape of patients with mCRPC in non-US and non-European settings within a real-world context. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV ID: NCT04801186.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41525044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.