Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524988›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

AI for screening in healthcare: promise and challenges.

Kenichi Saito, Shannon L Walston, Hirotaka Takita, Yasuhito Mitsuyama, Yuki Arita, Daiju Ueda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenichi SaitoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Shannon L WalstonDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Hirotaka TakitaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuhito MitsuyamaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Yuki AritaUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Daiju UedaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan. ai.labo.ocu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping population screening, yet the translation from laboratory performance to population benefit remains limited. This narrative review describes current uses of AI across major screening pathways. Prospective trials in mammography demonstrate non‑inferior cancer detection with large reductions in radiologist workload. In diabetic retinopathy, the first FDA‑authorized autonomous system extends specialist‑level screening into primary care and improves uptake. During colonoscopy, real‑time computer vision improves adenoma detection without increasing removal of non‑neoplastic tissue. Emerging multimodal approaches, including transformer‑based and large language model-enabled systems, integrate images, clinical variables, and molecular signals and underpin multi‑cancer early detection tests. Despite these gains, three constraints currently limit impact: the base‑rate problem in low‑prevalence cohorts, which magnifies the burden of false positives; limited generalizability and potential bias across institutions and populations; and practical barriers in workflow, regulation, and trust. Opportunities ahead include foundation models pre‑trained on diverse data, uncertainty‑aware "decision referral," federated learning, larger representative datasets, and prospective trials that track interval cancers, stage shift, and cost‑effectiveness. The overarching conclusion is cautious optimism: when validated and invisibly integrated, AI augments physicians, expands access, and improves efficiency; realizing durable public‑health benefits will depend on equity‑focused design, rigorous evaluation, and sustained human oversight.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep learningHealthcareScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.