ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
A nomogram model for challenging cases: differentiating fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in uncertain or misdiagnosed tumors.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a nomogram model that can accurately differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in clinically challenging scenarios where conventional imaging diagnosis is uncertain or erroneous.
methodsThis retrospective study included 404 patients with renal tumors. Unlike conventional cohort partitioning, we designed a clinically relevant test cohort specifically comprising two types of "difficult" cases: 74 patients with an indeterminate imaging diagnosis and 47 patients whose initial imaging diagnosis contradicted the pathological report. The training cohort (n = 283) consisted of cases with consistent imaging and pathological diagnoses. From preoperative computed tomography (CT) images, 1864 radiomic features were extracted. After a rigorous feature selection process using the Least Absolute Shrinkage, Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy (mRMR), 25 robust features were retained. Seven machine learning algorithms were evaluated to build the prediction model.
resultsThe ExtraTrees model demonstrated the best generalizability on the independent test cohort comprised of challenging cases, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.777. By integrating the radiomic model with clinical features, we constructed a nomogram. This combined model showed significantly improved performance, with an AUC of 0.815 (95% CI: 0.739-0.891) in the test cohort, outperforming the clinical model (AUC = 0.712) and the radiomics-only model (AUC = 0.777). Decision curve analysis confirmed the substantial clinical net benefit of the nomogram.
conclusionThis model provides a reliable tool to assist radiologists and urologists in making precise preoperative diagnoses for the most challenging renal tumors, thereby potentially avoiding unnecessary surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41524985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.