ArticlePituitary2026
Long-term cabergoline use does not predict degree of prolactinoma fibrosis nor significantly impact surgical outcomes.
Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prolactinoma assessment and management: an international multidisciplinary cross-sectional survey of current practice.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Article
- Dopamine agonist-associated fibrosis in prolactinomas: clinical challenges, impacts on the tumor microenvironment, and future directions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProlactinomas are often treated initially with dopamine agonists (DA). For patients subsequently treated with surgery, the effect of cabergoline (CAB) on tumor fibrosis and its potential impact on surgical outcomes is largely unexplored.
methodsRecords of patients with prolactinoma treated by a single surgeon between 2006 and 2024 were examined. Analyses considered relationships among duration and cumulative dose of presurgical DA (DA + vs. DA-), extent of fibrosis measured quantitatively by collagen volume fraction (CVF) and qualitatively by surgeon assessment, and remission status at last follow-up.
resultsOf 59 patients, 22 were DA- and 37 were DA+, including 29 treated only with CAB and 8 treated with CAB and bromocriptine. There were 44 macroadenomas, 13 microadenomas, and 2 giant adenomas; 28 had cavernous sinus invasion (Knosp grade 3-4) 52.5% were in remission at last follow-up. Median cumulative CAB dose was 79.3 mg (range, 5.4-6711), used for a median duration of 570 days (range, 16-7830). Neither CAB dose nor duration correlated with CVF (r
conclusionDuration and cumulative dose of presurgical CAB use do not correlate with quantitative measures of tumor fibrosis and do not reliably predict the degree of fibrosis at surgery or the likelihood of surgical remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.