SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cognition in nondiabetic patients with mild cognitive impairment or alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating the clinical effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases using minimal clinically important difference: systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Pooled it
- Peptide-Based Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease: Medicinal Chemistry, AI-Guided Computational Design, and Blood-Brain Barrier Delivery.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, the cognitive impact of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) remains unclear in non-diabetic patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), despite their widespread use for type 2 diabetes. This meta-analysis summarized cognitive outcomes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of GLP-1 RAs in non-diabetic patients with AD or MCI.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for studies through October 27, 2024. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses addressed variations in cognitive assessment methodologies. Between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² index.
resultsFour RCTs comprising 112 patients (61 placebo, 51 treatment) were included. For cognitive tests where higher scores indicate better outcomes, no significant difference was observed between GLP-1 RA and placebo groups (pooled SMD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.53, 0.34; I² = 23.9%). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Analysis of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale from two studies, where lower scores indicate better outcomes, similarly showed no significant treatment effect (SMD: 0.07, 95% CI: -0.47, 0.62; I² = 0%).
conclusionThere was no evidence that GLP-1 RAs improved cognitive outcomes compared to placebo in non-diabetic patients with AD or MCI. Further research is needed to clarify their neuroprotective potential and explore alternative therapeutic strategies for cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41524953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.