ReviewCurrent urology reports2026
Diagnosis and Management of Urinary Stone Disease in Pregnancy: Integrating Current Guidelines with Emerging Evidence.
Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewUrinary stone disease is among the most common non-obstetric conditions in pregnancy and carries significant maternal-fetal morbidity. Diagnosis and management are challenging, as the accuracy and efficacy of different modalities must be balanced against their pregnancy-specific risks. This narrative review evaluates society guidelines and emerging evidence on stone disease in pregnancy, focusing on population-based and comparative studies published since 2010. RECENT
findingsAdverse maternal-fetal outcomes associated with urinary stone disease in pregnancy may be exacerbated by delays and inconsistencies in care. Ultrasound is the recommended first-line imaging modality, but diagnostic accuracy is limited; emerging evidence supports low-dose CT as an alternative when diagnostic certainty is required. Conservative management remains the standard initial approach in uncomplicated cases. Evidence regarding tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy is inconclusive. When surgical management is necessary, prompt decompression should be considered; ureteral stenting may be favored over percutaneous nephrostomy in certain cases. Primary ureteroscopy is increasingly supported as a safe and effective definitive treatment. Management of urinary stone disease in pregnancy is challenging and demands a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach. Practice patterns are highly variable, both reflecting and contributing to the limited scope of current guidelines. Further research is needed to establish comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41524943What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.