ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Contemporary management of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a survey of Australian otolaryngologists.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term predictors of recurrence in pediatric recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess current experiences and practices in assessment and management of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) in Australian Otolaryngologists, with a secondary aim to determine the impact of Laryngology fellowship training on these outcomes.
methodsAn online survey was developed and emailed to practicing Australian Otolaryngologists, determined by membership and registration status with the Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgeons (ASOHNS).
resultsSeventy-four of 507 ASOHNS members completed the survey. Only 20.3% completed Laryngology fellowships (n=15/74). Those who saw <2 individual RRP patients/year were excluded, leaving 46 respondents. The majority (n=29/46) only operated on <5 patients per year, typically adults (n=37/46). Lasers overall were the most common instrument used in adult patients (n=17/37), whilst the microdebrider in those who managed juvenile disease (n=9/17). Adjuvant therapy was used in 74.4%, stroboscopy in 58.1% and voice therapy in 86.1%. Laryngology-trained respondents saw more patients, used stroboscopy, recommended vaccination, used laser and adjuvant therapy more than other respondents.
conclusionOur findings reflect the current trends of pre-operative, intraoperative and post-operative management of RRP amongst Australian Otolaryngology consultants. Many of these practices are consistent with findings from international literature, except for in-office procedures. Despite being a relatively rare disease, RRP presents a significant disease burden to the global population emphasising the importance of how it is managed. In recent decades, contemporary management options such as new ablative and angiolytic lasers and adjuvant options such as intralesional bevacizumab and the HPV vaccination have changed the way we manage RRP, particularly amongst the laryngology fellowship trained subspecialty population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.