Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524803›Full record

ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis-current clinical practise in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in Germany and establishment of an standard operating procedure (SOP) for primary, revision, and tumor TJA].

Andre Lunz, Andreas Geisbüsch, Frederike Lund, Sabrina Klein, Tilman Walker, Burkhard Lehner

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andre LunzZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200A, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland. andre.lunz@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Andreas GeisbüschZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200A, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Frederike LundKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Sabrina KleinZentrum für Infektiologie, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Tilman WalkerZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200A, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Burkhard LehnerZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200A, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is one of the key measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSI). In total joint replacement (TJA), infection prevention is crucial due to the risk of bacterial biofilm formation in the event of infection.

objectiveThe study's goal was to analyze the current clinical practise in German tertiary TJA centers (EPZmax), assess adherence to the currently valid German AWMF-S3 guideline, and present the contemporary literature on PAP in revision and tumor TJA. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 2023, a nationwide survey on PAP practices was conducted among 100 EPZmax institutions. In addition, a comprehensive review of the relevant literature and guidelines was performed, and an interdisciplinary institutional standard operating procedure (SOP) was developed.

resultsA total of 45 centers participated in the survey. First- and second-generation cephalosporins are used in 98% of primary and 95% of revision arthroplasties. In 98% of primary and 67% of revision procedures, PAP is administered as a single dose with 95% and 77% given within 30 minutes prior to incision, respectively. The evidence level for PAP was rated by the participating centers as high in primary and low to moderate in revision arthroplasty.

conclusionThe survey findings demonstrate guideline-conform implementation of PAP in primary TJA but reveal a heterogeneous situation in revision TJA. The interdisciplinary SOP written by the authors is based on the recommendations of the currently valid German guideline regarding the choice of antibiotic, dosing, and timing of PAP administration as well as on the differentiated approach in patients with a documented penicillin allergy. In deviation from the currently valid German guideline, and taking into account the available evidence and international expert consensus, an extended PAP for up to 24 hours is recommended for revision and tumor TJA, in order to adequately address the particular risk profile of these procedures (increased risk of infection and the potentially very severe consequences in the event of infection).

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisArthroplasty, ReplacementSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationAnti-Bacterial AgentsPerioperative antibiotic prophylaxisPeriprosthetic joint infectionRevision total joint arthroplastySurgical site infectionTotal joint arthroplastyTumor prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID41524803
PMCPMC13230264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.