ArticleCurrent microbiology2026
Comparison of ESKAPE Pathogen Levels in Wastewater and Receiving Water Bodies Using Agar-Based Enumeration and Real-Time PCR.
Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Linking wet-lab and genomic approaches for reliable detection of carbapenemase-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.) are key multidrug-resistant organisms increasingly recognized outside clinical settings. Their persistence in wastewater raises concerns regarding the efficacy of conventional treatment processes and the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to detect and quantify ESKAPE pathogens in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and downstream environments using agar-based enumeration and real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Culture methods detected all targeted species, with Enterobacter spp. being most abundant and A. baumannii least prevalent. RT-PCR quantified four species (E. faecium, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii), identifying K. pneumoniae as dominant. Both approaches revealed higher concentrations in influents that declined after treatment, although RT-PCR indicated elevated downstream levels, suggesting incomplete removal. The highest removal efficiency (100%) was observed for S. aureus and A. baumannii in WWTPs B and J, and the lowest (54.1%) for S. aureus in WWTP K. Integrating culture and molecular methods improved detection sensitivity and provided complementary insights. These results demonstrate that conventional treatment may not fully eliminate ESKAPE pathogens and underscore the need to include them in wastewater-based surveillance for antimicrobial resistance monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.