Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524794›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Measuring patient experiences in healthcare-overview of methods and the Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT) as an example].

Eva Christalle, Fabia von Blücher, Isabelle Scholl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva ChristalleInstitut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. e.christalle@uke.de.
Fabia von Blücher
Isabelle SchollInstitut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-centeredness is a key quality indicator of modern healthcare. To systematically assess this aspect, patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly used internationally. These tools enable standardized measurement of patient experiences and provide valuable information for evaluating and improving healthcare services. In Germany, however, there is still a lack of widespread, systematic use of such instruments.With the Experienced Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT), a generic PREM is now available in German for the first time that comprehensively measures patient-centeredness. Developed through a rigorous and methodologically sound process, the EPAT captures all relevant dimensions of patient-centeredness. It demonstrates high content validity and strong psychometric properties. Its availability in both long and short versions allows for flexible use across various care settings-in both outpatient and inpatient contexts.PREMs like the EPAT are suitable for a wide range of applications, including health services research, as feedback instruments, or for benchmarking purposes. A broad implementation of PREMs and transparent reporting of results are called for by policymakers and demanded by patients. PREMs are gaining importance in quality assurance, and their impact is being increasingly explored in scientific studies. Overall, the use of PREMs holds significant potential for a forward-looking, patient-centered healthcare system.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionPsychometricsQuality Assurance, Health CareGermanyHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare qualityMeasurementPatient focusPatient-reported experience measures (PREMs)Questionnaire development and evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41524794
PMCPMC12852202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.