ArticleArchives of microbiology2026
Differential impact of toxic twins, anthracene and phenanthrene, on photosynthetic performance, oxidative stress, and bioremediation potential of microalgae.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Anthracene Derivatives as Potent Antioxidants: Experimental, DFT, and Docking Studies.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares the physiological and biochemical effects of 3-ring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Anthracene (ANT, linear arrangement) and Phenanthrene (PHE, angular arrangement), on microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus acutus. The findings revealed that PHE exerted significant toxic effects on algal growth and photosynthetic parameters, including electron transport rate of PSII [ETR(II)] and quantum yield of PSII [Y(II)], in both species. Additionally, it significantly influenced the regulation of the non-photochemical quenching mechanism [Y(NPQ) and Y(NO)], which was responsible for the energy distribution. Moreover, it altered the photosynthetic pigments content, biomolecules profile, and non-enzymatic antioxidants in both microalgae. On the other hand, ANT exposure showed noticeable positive changes in the measured parameters. Both microalgae exhibited a slight increase in chlorophyll content, biochemical compounds, and PSII activity, with the more pronounced effects observed in S. acutus, indicating its higher resistance to ANT. Furthermore, our findings also reveal that both species effectively removed ANT and PHE from the medium within 7 days of cultivation. These findings suggest that PAH toxicity is not only influenced by molecular weight and the number of benzene rings but also by the structural arrangement of their rings. Importantly, this study highlights that both microalgae can tolerate ANT and are suitable candidates for ANT bioremediation, but not for PHE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41524773What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.