Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524725›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2026

Bycatch in a bottle: what taxa are recoverable from metabarcoding DNA in historical invertebrate collection preservative fluid?

Ajith Seresinghe, David Herbst, Jen Quick-Cleveland, Severyn Korneyev, Benjamin K Maples, Eva Sofia Horna Lowell, Malia Mosser, Robert N Fisher, Eric P Palkovacs, Daniel Gluesenkamp and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ajith SeresingheDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-5457-8035
David HerbstInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7879-5902
Jen Quick-ClevelandDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4070-8842
Severyn KorneyevCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture, Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832-1448, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-7695
Benjamin K MaplesCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture, Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832-1448, United States.
Eva Sofia Horna LowellSan Diego Natural History Museum, 1788 El Prado Balboa Park, San Diego, CA 92101, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1865-5705
Malia MosserDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States.
Robert N FisherU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego, CA 92101, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2693-8780
Eric P PalkovacsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-7263
Daniel GluesenkampCalifornia Institute for Biodiversity, 1400 Shattuck Ave. STE #12 PMB 101, Berkeley, CA, 94709, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-2697-9572
Rachel S MeyerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4907-5797

Funding

California Institute for Biodiversity A22-0873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural history museum collections are invaluable repositories of biodiversity, offering insights into life on Earth. Genomic approaches provide powerful tools to characterize biodiversity in these collections. However using these collections for genomics without damaging specimens is a challenge. Here, we develop and test non-destructive DNA metabarcoding methods to capture biodiversity from the preservative fluids of archived insect collections ('Bycatch'). We optimized workflows for extracting and amplifying the partial CO1 locus (CO1) and fungal ITS1 locus from ethanol-based preservative fluids, validating ethanol preparation methods, comparing DNA extraction kits, and refining PCR protocols. Our results demonstrate that from museum collections with low DNA yields, CO1 and fungal ITS1 loci can often be recovered from preservative fluids, and we present detailed methodology and workflows. We test metabarcoding success to recover taxa in several museum collections ranging in age and storage condition. This is to support the State of California's effort to catalog and sequence all insects and fungi, building baselines of California biodiversity with help from museum collections. Lastly, we investigate the complementarity of metabarcoding water versus ethanol and morphological identifications aimed to capture benthic macroinvertebrate biodiversity in streams. Our findings highlight that DNA metabarcoding of the preservative fluid is a non-destructive tool for capturing biodiversity in historical specimens, but there are limitations on the overlaps between DNA results and physical contents, where morphological identification still reigns in taxon counts, but metabarcoding sometimes provides more taxonomic resolution, and can be used to track DNA from other organisms such as fungi beyond the directly surveyed specimens.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicInsectaInvertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityCaliforniaDNAFungiMuseumsSpecimen HandlingDNAbenthic macroinvertebrate communitieseDNAfungal associatesinsect communitiesnatural history collections

Identifiers

PMID41524725
PMCPMC13539438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.