Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524579›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026

Measuring outcomes of training in Empathetic Refutational Interviewing (ERI) for vaccine communication: Development and validation of the ERI Skills Inventory (ERISI).

Linda C Karlsson, Dawn Holford, Emma Anderson, Pierre Verger, Arnaud Gagneur, Virginia C Gould, Ron Cheng, Dionne Engmann, Anna Soveri, Stephan Lewandowsky

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linda C KarlssonDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2883-9153
Dawn HolfordSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6392-3991
Emma AndersonSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Pierre VergerFaculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, ORS PACA (Southeastern Health Regional Observatory), Marseille, France.
Arnaud GagneurDepartment of Pediatrics, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Virginia C GouldSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ron ChengSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Dionne EngmannSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anna SoveriDepartment of Psychology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
Stephan LewandowskySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the complex nature of vaccine hesitancy and the vast amount of misinformation surrounding vaccination, training healthcare professionals (HCPs) in vaccine communication is important to ensure high vaccine uptake. Recently, a new vaccine communication approach, known as the Empathetic Refutational Interview (ERI), was developed to help HCPs in conversations with patients who have vaccine concerns. In the present study, we developed and validated the ERI Skills Inventory (ERISI) for assessing learning outcomes of training in ERI. The ERISI measures are (1) ERI-related knowledge, (2) ERI-related skills, and (3) confidence in using the ERI. A sample of 103 HCPs who took part in ERI training responded to the ERISI, as well as questions about their self-efficacy in vaccine consultations and preparedness to refute arguments against vaccination, before and after the training. At two follow-ups, they also reported their understanding and use of the ERI. Results showed that the ERISI is sensitive to positive changes in ERI knowledge and confidence as a result of training. Participants also showed increased use post-training of ERI skills to demonstrate empathy toward patients. However, no change was observed for ERI skills that refute misconceptions and inform patients using factual information, which participants tended to already use at pretest. ERI knowledge correlated positively with ERI skills at posttest. ERI confidence demonstrated both concurrent and predictive validity. The ERISI questionnaire is a valuable tool for assessing ERI training outcomes that can guide training development to ensure learning and future skill application.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmpathyVaccinationFemaleHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccination HesitancycommunicationEmpathetic Refutational InterviewERISIhealthcare professionalsmeasurement validationtrainingVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41524579
PMCPMC12802977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.