ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Community Acceptance of a Pediatric Prehospital Exception From Informed Consent Trial.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFederal Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) regulations allow emergency care research without a priori consent under limited conditions by integrating feedback from community consultation and notification of communities through public disclosure (CC/PD) activities (21 CFR 50.24). Our objectives were to evaluate community acceptance of a pediatric emergency care trial using a commercial survey tool and to determine the characteristics associated with supportive respondents.
methodsThe Pediatric Prehospital Airway Resuscitation Trial (Pedi-PART) is an EFIC trial designed to compare pediatric prehospital airway management strategies. Pedi-PART conducted community consultation/public disclosure (CC/PD) activities in March-April 2024. The CC/PD process used a commercial marketing research platform (Qualtrics Inc.) to provide study information and solicit feedback via an 18-question survey. Participants indicated support for the study through three specific questions and provided demographic characteristics. We determined the predictors of trial approval among survey respondents.
resultsA total of 6753 individuals completed surveys. The median age was 42 (IQR: 30-59) years, 62% were female, 13% were Black, and 15% were Hispanic. Survey respondents indicated support for conducting Pedi-PART in their community as follows: 90% of males, 91% of females, 89% of Blacks, 92% of Hispanics, 92% of Whites, 90% of other race/ethnicities, and 93% of parents of a child < 18 years. Among respondents with less than a high school education, 84% approved of the study compared to 93% in those with a post-graduate degree. Among those with an annual household income < $20,000, 85% approved of the study compared to 94% of those with an > $100,000 annual household income. In multivariable analysis, higher education and being the parent/guardian of a minor child were associated with support of the trial.
conclusionsSurvey respondents largely supported the Pedi-PART trial. Respondents who were parents or who had higher education were more likely to support the trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.