SynthesisArthritis care & research2026
Utilization of Rehabilitation Services Among People With Common Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Arthritis care & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRehabilitation services, including physical and occupational therapy, are frequently recommended in the management of many autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), yet utilization remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how frequently people with common ARDs utilize rehabilitation services.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies published through December 2023 that reported rehabilitation utilization (percentage utilization and/or number of visits) among individuals with ARDs. PubMed and CINAHL were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies, and data were extracted and summarized by disease, discipline, reporting period, and country.
resultsOf 11,591 records identified, 113 studies met inclusion criteria, and 86 were included in the final analysis. These studies were published between 1991 and 2023, with data representing 22 countries. Rehabilitation utilization was most frequently reported for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 59), axial spondyloarthritis (n = 25), and systemic sclerosis (n = 20). Percentage utilization rates ranged from 0% to 100%, and annual visit counts ranged from 1 to 62.1, varying widely across and within disease types, reporting periods, and countries. Physical therapy was more commonly reported and utilized than occupational therapy. Utilization rates were generally higher in European countries compared to North America.
conclusionThere was heterogeneity across studies underscoring wide variability in the use of rehabilitation services. These findings highlight inconsistent integration of rehabilitation into rheumatology care across diseases and health systems. Future research should investigate current barriers and facilitators and inform the development of systematic, equitable, and disease-specific strategies to optimize access and delivery of rehabilitation for people with ARDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.