ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Machine Learning-Assisted DNA Origami Shape Sorting Using Fingerprinting Nanosensors and Feature Engineering.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation SERS Probes: Engineering Hotspots, Intelligent Molecular Targeting, and AI-Driven Spectral Analysis for Emerging Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- DNA Origami and Their Application in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconfigurable DNA nanostructures have emerged as a promising research area with applications in drug delivery, molecular computing, biosensing, and stimuli-responsive soft nanomaterials. While significant progress has been made in creating novel DNA nanostructures and exploring their applications, comparatively little effort has focused on developing new methodologies to confirm their folding. Conventional imaging approaches typically rely on sophisticated microscopy techniques including atomic force and transmission electron microscopy. Alternative low-cost methods for verifying DNA nanostructure assembly and shape sorting are thus highly valuable. Here, we present a fingerprinting nanosensor array integrated with machine learning (ML) to distinguish between two DNA origami shapes (triangle and nanotube) and to differentiate them from an unfolded scaffold strand. The nanosensor array, consisting of 11 nanoassemblies, termed nanosensors, is prepared by complexing graphene oxide nanosheets (nGO) with 11 fluorophore-labeled single-stranded DNA probes. Upon complexation, the fluorescence of the DNA probes is quenched through graphene oxide-mediated fluorescence quenching. Adding the DNA nanostructures to each nanosensor displaced a fraction of the surface-adsorbed fluorescent DNA probes, producing unique fluorescence recovery signatures that were subsequently processed through feature engineering for accurate ML-assisted classification. Using this approach, we achieved 94% prediction accuracy in discriminating DNA origami triangle, DNA origami nanotube, and unassembled M13 scaffold. Our strategy provides a new and generalizable platform for shape sorting in DNA origami field, offering new avenues for high-throughput, label-free classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.