Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524325›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

Machine Learning-Assisted DNA Origami Shape Sorting Using Fingerprinting Nanosensors and Feature Engineering.

Shubhajit Singha, M Mikail Demir, Vinod Morya, Ken Halvorsen, M Abdullah Canbaz, Arun Richard Chandrasekaran, Mehmet V Yigit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shubhajit SinghaDepartment of Chemistry, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.
M Mikail DemirDepartment of Information Sciences and Technology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.
Vinod MoryaThe RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-4108
Ken HalvorsenThe RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2578-1339
M Abdullah CanbazDepartment of Information Sciences and Technology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.
Arun Richard ChandrasekaranThe RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-5464
Mehmet V YigitDepartment of Chemistry, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4349-3701

Funding

Manipulating nucleic acids: applications in RNA biosensing, single-molecule analysis, and DNA nanotechnologyR35GM124720 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI Ken A Halvorsen · 2017 to 2026
$4.6M
Programmable DNA Nanostructures as Biomedical and Structural ScaffoldsR35GM150672 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI Arun Richard Chandrasekaran · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
DNA nanotechnology and synthetic biology for AI-supported detection and precision therapeuticsR35GM156250 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI Mehmet Veysel Yigit · 2025 to 2026
$779k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124720NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM150672NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconfigurable DNA nanostructures have emerged as a promising research area with applications in drug delivery, molecular computing, biosensing, and stimuli-responsive soft nanomaterials. While significant progress has been made in creating novel DNA nanostructures and exploring their applications, comparatively little effort has focused on developing new methodologies to confirm their folding. Conventional imaging approaches typically rely on sophisticated microscopy techniques including atomic force and transmission electron microscopy. Alternative low-cost methods for verifying DNA nanostructure assembly and shape sorting are thus highly valuable. Here, we present a fingerprinting nanosensor array integrated with machine learning (ML) to distinguish between two DNA origami shapes (triangle and nanotube) and to differentiate them from an unfolded scaffold strand. The nanosensor array, consisting of 11 nanoassemblies, termed nanosensors, is prepared by complexing graphene oxide nanosheets (nGO) with 11 fluorophore-labeled single-stranded DNA probes. Upon complexation, the fluorescence of the DNA probes is quenched through graphene oxide-mediated fluorescence quenching. Adding the DNA nanostructures to each nanosensor displaced a fraction of the surface-adsorbed fluorescent DNA probes, producing unique fluorescence recovery signatures that were subsequently processed through feature engineering for accurate ML-assisted classification. Using this approach, we achieved 94% prediction accuracy in discriminating DNA origami triangle, DNA origami nanotube, and unassembled M13 scaffold. Our strategy provides a new and generalizable platform for shape sorting in DNA origami field, offering new avenues for high-throughput, label-free classification.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesDNADNA NanostructuresMachine LearningNanotechnologyDNA ProbesFluorescent DyesGraphiteDNADNA ProbesFluorescent Dyesgraphene oxideGraphite

Identifiers

PMID41524325
PMCPMC12856829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.