ArticleBone & joint open2026
Identification of important outcomes for surgical and brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : qualitative analysis of the perspectives of young people, parents, and healthcare professionals.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of high-compliance bracing in patients with severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis declining operative intervention.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: High-quality clinical trials in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are needed to guide decision-making but progress is hindered by suboptimal selection of outcome measures. Identifying meaningful outcomes for consistent measurement across clinical trials and routine practice is critical. However, there is currently no understanding of which treatment outcome domains are considered important by adolescents, their parents, and healthcare professionals (HCPs). This study is the first to address this gap internationally. Methods: This study represents the first stage of core outcome set (COS) development, following gold-standard guidance. A cross-sectional qualitative interview study with 40 participants (adolescents with AIS, their parents, and HCPs) was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed to identify and categorize important AIS treatment outcomes. Analytical rigour was ensured through coder agreement and stakeholder consultation. Results: A total of 91 important outcome domains were identified; 53 outcome domains applying to both bracing and surgery, with 15 additional outcome domains for bracing only, and 23 additional outcome domains for surgery only. Of the 91 outcome domains, more than three-quarters (71/91, 78%) related to life impact, with smaller proportions relating to physiological/clinical outcomes (13/91, 14%), resource use (4/91, 4%), and adverse events (1/91, 1%). Conclusion: The current study highlights treatment outcomes considered important by adolescents with AIS, their parents, and HCPs. These findings will inform outcome selection in clinical trials and routine practice, as well as facilitating an ongoing programme of research to develop a COS for evaluating treatment of AIS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.