ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025
Determining Good Candidates for Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and Device Therapy and Which Device to Implant.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hospitalization profiles and complications across ICD and CRT-D implantations in Germany: data from the VIDEO study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 'ablate-and-pace' strategy, combining atrioventricular junction ablation with permanent pacing, has re-emerged as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with AF who are symptomatic, have poor rate control or develop AF-mediated cardiomyopathy. While historically considered a last-resort treatment, recent randomised trials and meta-analyses support its efficacy in improving functional status, reducing hospitalisations and potentially enhancing survival, particularly when paired with CRT or conduction system pacing. The success of this approach depends on careful patient selection and appropriate device choice. Candidates include patients with uncontrolled ventricular rates, tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, symptomatic bradycardia or those with poor CRT response due to persistent AF. Right ventricular pacing should be avoided when possible, in favour of biventricular or conduction system pacing, which preserves synchrony and reduces pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This review discusses clinical scenarios, prognostic considerations, and current device options - including leadless systems - offering a practical guide for tailoring atrioventricular junction ablation-based therapies to individual patient profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.