Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524081›Full record

ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025

Determining Good Candidates for Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and Device Therapy and Which Device to Implant.

Arnaud Bisson, Thibaut Lenormand, Mathieu Jacobs, Laurent Fauchier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Hospitalization profiles and complications across ICD and CRT-D implantations in Germany: data from the VIDEO study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arnaud BissonService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3449-1800
Thibaut LenormandService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours Tours, France.
Mathieu JacobsService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8803-7275
Laurent FauchierService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire et Faculté de Médecine de Tours Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9267-1658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'ablate-and-pace' strategy, combining atrioventricular junction ablation with permanent pacing, has re-emerged as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with AF who are symptomatic, have poor rate control or develop AF-mediated cardiomyopathy. While historically considered a last-resort treatment, recent randomised trials and meta-analyses support its efficacy in improving functional status, reducing hospitalisations and potentially enhancing survival, particularly when paired with CRT or conduction system pacing. The success of this approach depends on careful patient selection and appropriate device choice. Candidates include patients with uncontrolled ventricular rates, tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, symptomatic bradycardia or those with poor CRT response due to persistent AF. Right ventricular pacing should be avoided when possible, in favour of biventricular or conduction system pacing, which preserves synchrony and reduces pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This review discusses clinical scenarios, prognostic considerations, and current device options - including leadless systems - offering a practical guide for tailoring atrioventricular junction ablation-based therapies to individual patient profiles.

Indexed as

AFAtrioventricular junction ablationcardiac resynchronisation therapyconduction system pacingheart failure

Identifiers

PMID41524081
PMCPMC12784268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.