ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Hybrid Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Decade-Long Single-Center Experience.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mini- and Micro-Invasive Approaches in Cardiac Surgery: Current Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a major public health burden, especially in its long-standing persistent form, which is often resistant to pharmacological or catheter-based therapies. Hybrid ablation, which integrates minimally invasive surgical and endocardial catheter techniques, has been introduced to address these complex cases. However, data evaluating the long-term comparative effectiveness of immediate versus staged ablation strategies remain limited, and the specific contribution of adjunctive targets, such as Bachmann's bundle (BB), remains unclear. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 60 patients with long-standing persistent AF who underwent hybrid ablation between 2008 and 2020. All patients received thoracoscopic epicardial ablation followed by endocardial catheter ablation either during the same hospitalization ("immediate group", n = 20) or ≥4 weeks later ("staged group", n = 40). A subset of patients underwent adjunctive BB ablation. The primary outcome was freedom from documented AF recurrence. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, hospitalization duration, and long-term survival. Results: At a mean follow-up of 106 ± 12 months, sinus rhythm was maintained in 90.0% of patients in the immediate group and 62.5% in the staged group ( Conclusions: Hybrid ablation provides durable rhythm control and excellent safety over long-term follow-up. BB ablation enhances success and should be considered in procedural planning. Immediate catheter ablation may be a viable strategy in appropriately selected patients, potentially reducing hospitalization time and healthcare resource utilization. Our findings support the need for individualized ablation strategies in complex AF management and underscore the importance of integrating adjunctive targets, such as BB, into advanced procedural workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.