ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Procedural Insights.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endocardial Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Atrial Fibrillation: Device Design, Clinical Evidence, and Postprocedural Antithrombotic Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and a major cause of cardioembolic stroke, with the left atrial appendage representing the predominant site of thrombus formation. Oral anticoagulation (OAC)-particularly with direct oral anticoagulants-remains the cornerstone of stroke prevention; however, contraindications and bleeding risks limit the use of OAC in selected patients. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as a device-based alternative to oral anticoagulation. Moreover, the indications of LAAC are expanding to include recurrent ischemic stroke despite adequate anticoagulation and patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Thus, this review synthesizes the current evidence on LAAC and provides a practical, step-by-step procedural roadmap, from preprocedural imaging with transesophageal echocardiography or cardiac computed tomography and anatomical sizing, to transseptal puncture, device selection, deployment, and release criteria, as well as intraprocedural imaging and hemodynamic assessment. Advances in imaging modalities, procedural planning, and device technology have improved both efficacy and safety. However, postprocedural antithrombotic strategies remain heterogeneous and the subject of ongoing clinical trials. Future research is expected to refine patient selection, optimize pharmacotherapy after LAAC, and further define the role of LAAC in the contemporary management of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.