Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524067›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Prediction of Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device: Opening Pandora's Box.

Claudia Maria Loardi, Marco Zanobini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudia Maria LoardiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Tours University Hospital, 37044 Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-6692
Marco ZanobiniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4400-0451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent a leading option in the treatment of end-stage heart failure (HF), provided that right ventricular (RV) contractile function is sufficiently preserved to ensure cardiac output after LVAD implantation. In this context, evaluating the RV before surgery is crucial, as the onset of early right heart failure (RHF) following LVAD placement is linked to increased mortality and morbidity. Unfortunately, the contractile performance of the RV is a difficult issue to evaluate and requires a multimodal approach based on the application of multiple diagnostic tools, including clinical assessment, echocardiography, right heart catheterization (RHC), and risk models, all of which have variable predictive power in the currently available literature. Pre-implantation RV assessment is even more challenging and misleading in patients with hemodynamic instability under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, a situation characterized by complete right heart unloading, which renders most assessment techniques unreliable. The present paper proposes a simple and comprehensive preoperative appraisal strategy for the RV, which is adapted to the clinical status (critical or more stable) of the patient, based on a review of the advantages and limitations of each diagnostic modality and derived parameters.

Indexed as

echocardiographyend-stage heart failureleft ventricular assist deviceright ventricular function

Identifiers

PMID41524067
PMCPMC12781000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.