ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Prediction of Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device: Opening Pandora's Box.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent a leading option in the treatment of end-stage heart failure (HF), provided that right ventricular (RV) contractile function is sufficiently preserved to ensure cardiac output after LVAD implantation. In this context, evaluating the RV before surgery is crucial, as the onset of early right heart failure (RHF) following LVAD placement is linked to increased mortality and morbidity. Unfortunately, the contractile performance of the RV is a difficult issue to evaluate and requires a multimodal approach based on the application of multiple diagnostic tools, including clinical assessment, echocardiography, right heart catheterization (RHC), and risk models, all of which have variable predictive power in the currently available literature. Pre-implantation RV assessment is even more challenging and misleading in patients with hemodynamic instability under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, a situation characterized by complete right heart unloading, which renders most assessment techniques unreliable. The present paper proposes a simple and comprehensive preoperative appraisal strategy for the RV, which is adapted to the clinical status (critical or more stable) of the patient, based on a review of the advantages and limitations of each diagnostic modality and derived parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.