ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
CatLet Score as a Predictor of Cardiac Death in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From Interpretable Machine Learning Models.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predicting cardiac death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major challenge. The Coronary Artery Tree description and lesion evaluation (CatLet) angiographic scoring system can describe the variability in coronary artery anatomy, the degree of stenosis of the affected coronary artery, and the subtended myocardial territory. Therefore, this study aimed to establish an effective and interpretable machine learning (ML) model to explore the relationship between the CatLet score and cardiac death in patients with AMI. Methods: The CatLet score was calculated in 767 consecutively enrolled patients with AMI. Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and restricted cubic spline analysis were used to explore the association between the CatLet score and cardiac death in patients with AMI. Six ML methods were used to build predictive models. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was used to visualize model features and individual case predictions. Results: Compared to the lowest CatLet score of tertile 1, patients with the highest CatLet score (tertile 3) had a higher risk of cardiac death (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-10.08; Conclusions: The Catlet score positively correlates with the risk of cardiac death in patients with AMI, while the use of ML modeling can effectively predict the risk of cardiac death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.